• Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question

I'm glad to see somone else here sees t

By: Dana Point POSTED: Friday October 05, 2007 19:32

Doctorj17171717 - all excellent points and I am thankful for the thought you put into expressing them. I can't agree with you more. 
 
We own a home in Sedona a live here full-time now. We do not own a rental. But 3 years ago we did not live here, we were in California, and we relied heavily on vacation rental homes for our visits to Sedona. We enjoyed them very much, were able to bring our little dog, we felt like we could "try out what it would be like to live here" before making our real estate purchase. But, like most vactioners, we could only take a week-long vacation at a time, not month-long ones. If back then we could only rent for a month or longer, we would not have been able to come here unless we stayed in a hotel or B&B. Because of this, I think it's the hotels and B&Bs that are mostly behind this new tighter mindset and renewed interest in Article 6. It's in their best interests & benefit. 
 
Also, the homeowners or residents who believe this is the endall solution to "unruly" guests in their neighboring rentals, well, I have news for you, people who stay for an entire month can be pretty unruly too! Even more so, they might feel more entitled to do things, like let garbarge pile up, park cars everywhere or have bigger parties, than a shorter term renter would. If the new longer-term tenant has to pay so much more for the stay they might need to rent the home along with other people, to be able to afford the higher rental amount and longer term...which means you will have even more people in the property next to you at a time.  
 
Personally, now that I am a full-time resident here, I'd rather have a short-term tenant next to me, incase they were a bad apple, I knew they'd be out quickly. Instead of knowing I had 29 more days of them. 
 
Another downside to this is that many people here who own rentals now won't be able to afford to keep them anymore, without as many tenants coming and going. So, these homes will need to be sold quickly, adding to the surplus of homes on the market and the lower home prices.  
 
Sedona's livlihood and life blood is tourism. It is shocking that the city would want to make it more difficult for a tourist to stay here.  
 
I've seen a few posts on TripAdvisor.com and other tourist message boards from potential visitors who are now put-off by this ban on short-term rentals and wonder why they are being punished when they are good, quiet, decent people, like most of us are, who just want to rent a home here, like they can in most tourist-friendly locales.  
 
What is going to happen now is that the people who own the rentals properties who do not want to sell, will simply rent to a person for a week and then leave the home vacant for the other 3 weeks. Not many rental owners can afford to do this, but that is what they will be forced to do. So, you will STILL get a short-term tenant next to you regardless!

 

» Report this comment to administrator

» Reply to this comment...

»  Go back to the article


mXcomment 1.0.7 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
Rouge

Cheapest Sedona Gas Prices


Sedona Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com

Latest Photos

119photo.jpg

You can now purchase the photos you like. Click here or the photo above to view our galleries.